17.1 1) if an ambassador does commit crime in the country he is serving in, does the home country usually inflict larger punishment on the diplomate since the diplomate may have hurt the home countries reputation? 2)can ambassadors serve for life?
17.2 1)why did congress decide that after 9/11 it was necessary to create the DNI as a separate office instead of as a sub branch of the CIA? 2) why was the department of homeland security not formed earlier than 2002?
.1 1)can a diplomat receive a larger sentence for the same crime because his actions can hurt the rep. of the home country 2) can a diplomats immunity be revoked in a foreign country? .2 1)Why isn't homeland part of the CIA 2) should the nsa be allow to access personal information as well as physical screening?
17.1: 1) What do the people in the Department of Foreign Affairs do? 2) Why are ambassadors free from being arrested, taxed, or sued?
17.2: 1) If the secretary of defense elected by the president is not liked after the senate approves he/she, what steps are taken to get rid of or "impeach" the secretary of defense? 2) After major terroristic attacks, do members of Homeland Security take heat for not catching them ahead of time?
Sec.1 1. What if the ambassador is actually doing something that is a threat to the country they are in, they still cannot be punished? 2. Is it possible for the U.S. to return to a policy of isolationism? Sec.2 1.Why can women still not serve in the special forces of the military? 2. Why did it take so long for homeland security to come into existance?
Section 1: 1. Do economic sanctions really work against a country like Iran? 2. Are our ambassadors and their employees really safe in other countries? (for example, Iran hostages and Benghazi) Section 2: 1. Why did the Founding Fathers want the people/civilians/Congress to have so much authority over the military? 2. How did the tragedy of September 11, 2001 change how US Intelligence deals with terrorism today?
section 1 1. why or why not is possible for the U.S to return to isolationism? 2. why is diplomatic immunity needed to be civil with other countries? section 2 1. why is civilian control over the military so important and why is it important today? 2. how might terrorist attacks such as 9/11 be prevented in the U.S?
17.1 1.how could or what would change the U.S. back to being an isolated country? 2. Do you think the united states being the only country to use an atomic weapon brought a more positive or negative effect towards foreign policy? Explain why.
17.2 1. Decribe the three things Nation's security provides. 2.How do terroristic events such as 9/11change the nations security?
17.1 1.would it be more difficult to get into other countries without passports and visas? 2. What would happen if ambassadors were not granted diplomatic immunity? 17.2 1.how differently would our country be refered to if our country didn't have such a storing defense department. 2.how would the our countries military function if we didn't have chief military asides?
Questions we discussed in class: #1. Do you think the United States punish our ambassadors differently if they commit a crime overseas? #2. Should the T.S.A. be allowed to pat you down, in addition to searching through your stuff? #3. Would a member of the President's cabinet ever be impeached? Do you think it would come to this? #4. Is it possible for the United States to return to a policy of isolation? Why or why not? #5- Why did the founding fathers think it was a good idea to have civilian oversight of the military, c.i.a., f.b.i., n.s.a., etc.? #6- Do you think our foreign policy is effective because we have used nuclear weapons?
17.1
ReplyDelete1) if an ambassador does commit crime in the country he is serving in, does the home country usually inflict larger punishment on the diplomate since the diplomate may have hurt the home countries reputation?
2)can ambassadors serve for life?
17.2
ReplyDelete1)why did congress decide that after 9/11 it was necessary to create the DNI as a separate office instead of as a sub branch of the CIA?
2) why was the department of homeland security not formed earlier than 2002?
.1
ReplyDelete1)can a diplomat receive a larger sentence for the same crime because his actions can hurt the rep. of the home country
2) can a diplomats immunity be revoked in a foreign country?
.2
1)Why isn't homeland part of the CIA
2) should the nsa be allow to access personal information as well as physical screening?
17.1:
ReplyDelete1) What do the people in the Department of Foreign Affairs do?
2) Why are ambassadors free from being arrested, taxed, or sued?
17.2:
1) If the secretary of defense elected by the president is not liked after the senate approves he/she, what steps are taken to get rid of or "impeach" the secretary of defense?
2) After major terroristic attacks, do members of Homeland Security take heat for not catching them ahead of time?
Sec.1
ReplyDelete1. What if the ambassador is actually doing something that is a threat to the country they are in, they still cannot be punished?
2. Is it possible for the U.S. to return to a policy of isolationism?
Sec.2
1.Why can women still not serve in the special forces of the military?
2. Why did it take so long for homeland security to come into existance?
Section 1:
ReplyDelete1. Do economic sanctions really work against a country like Iran?
2. Are our ambassadors and their employees really safe in other countries? (for example, Iran hostages and Benghazi)
Section 2:
1. Why did the Founding Fathers want the people/civilians/Congress to have so much authority over the military?
2. How did the tragedy of September 11, 2001 change how US Intelligence deals with terrorism today?
section 1
ReplyDelete1. why or why not is possible for the U.S to return to isolationism?
2. why is diplomatic immunity needed to be civil with other countries?
section 2
1. why is civilian control over the military so important and why is it important today?
2. how might terrorist attacks such as 9/11 be prevented in the U.S?
17.1
ReplyDelete1.how could or what would change the U.S. back to being an isolated country?
2. Do you think the united states being the only country to use an atomic weapon brought a more positive or negative effect towards foreign policy? Explain why.
17.2
1. Decribe the three things Nation's security provides.
2.How do terroristic events such as 9/11change the nations security?
17.1
ReplyDelete1.would it be more difficult to get into other countries without passports and visas?
2. What would happen if ambassadors were not granted diplomatic immunity?
17.2
1.how differently would our country be refered to if our country didn't have such a storing defense department.
2.how would the our countries military function if we didn't have chief military asides?
Questions we discussed in class:
ReplyDelete#1. Do you think the United States punish our ambassadors differently if they commit a crime overseas?
#2. Should the T.S.A. be allowed to pat you down, in addition to searching through your stuff?
#3. Would a member of the President's cabinet ever be impeached? Do you think it would come to this?
#4. Is it possible for the United States to return to a policy of isolation? Why or why not?
#5- Why did the founding fathers think it was a good idea to have civilian oversight of the military, c.i.a., f.b.i., n.s.a., etc.?
#6- Do you think our foreign policy is effective because we have used nuclear weapons?